Increased bleeding risk with enoxaparin venothromboembolism prophylaxis compared with heparin in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative venothromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis is an established tenant of bariatric surgery; however, there is little comparative data to guide medication choice. The objective of this study was to determine if a change in VTE prophylaxis from heparin to enoxaparin was associated with differing rates of postoperative bleeding and VTE occurrence after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients 18 years or older who underwent primary bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)) at a single institution between March 2012 and December 2021. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin was utilized for VTE prophylaxis from March 2012 through February 2018 and then enoxaparin was used from March 2018 through December 2021. Postoperative bleeding was defined as requiring a blood transfusion or reoperation for bleeding within 30 days of surgery. Chi-square test was used to test for differences between groups. RESULTS: There were 2159 patients who underwent bariatric surgery with 1324 (61.3%) patients in the heparin group and 835 (38.7%) in the enoxaparin group. Overall, 1,503 (69.6%) patients underwent SG and 656 (30.4%) RYGB. There was no difference in the ratio of SG to RYGB between the heparin and enoxaparin groups. Most patients were female (n = 1709, 79.2%) with a median age of 43.2 years (interquartile range (IQR): 35.6-52.2), and median BMI of 44.9 (IQR: 40.9-50.5). Overall postoperative bleeding occurred more frequently in the enoxaparin group (n = 26, 3.1%) compared with the heparin group (n = 12, 0.9%) (p < 0.01). Additionally, reoperation for bleeding was more frequent with enoxaparin (enoxaparin 0.8% vs. heparin 0.2%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in VTE occurrence between the two groups (heparin: n = 14, 1.1%, enoxaparin: n = 7, 0.8% (p = 0.61)). CONCLUSIONS: An institutional change from heparin to enoxaparin for bariatric surgery perioperative VTE prophylaxis was associated with a significant increase in postoperative bleeding, with no difference in VTE complications.

Association between improved adenoma detection rates and interval colorectal cancer rates after a quality improvement program.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, interval CRCs (iCRCs) still occur. We aimed to determine iCRC incidence, assess the relationship between adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and iCRC rates, and evaluate iCRC rates over time concomitant with initiation of an institutional colonoscopy quality improvement (QI) program. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy at an academic medical center (January 2003 to December 2015). We identified iCRCs through our data warehouse and reviewed charts to confirm appropriateness for study inclusion. iCRC was defined as a cancer diagnosed 6 to 60 months and early iCRC as a cancer diagnosed 6 to 36 months after index colonoscopy. We measured the relationship between provider ADRs and iCRC rates and assessed iCRC rates over time with initiation of a QI program that started in 2010. RESULTS: A total of 193,939 colonoscopies were performed over the study period. We identified 186 patients with iCRC. The overall iCRC rate was .12% and the early iCRC rate .06%. Average-risk patients undergoing colonoscopy by endoscopists in the highest ADR quartile (34%-52%) had a 4-fold lower iCRC risk (relative risk, .23; 95% confidence interval, .11-.48) than those undergoing colonoscopy by endoscopists in the lowest quartile (12%-21%). After QI program initiation, overall iCRC rates improved from .15% to .08% (P < .001) and early iCRC rates improved from .07% to .04% (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that iCRC rate is inversely correlated with provider ADR. ADRs increased and iCRC rates decreased over time, concomitant with a QI program focused on split-dose bowel preparation, quality metric measurement, provider education, and feedback. iCRC rate measurement should be considered a feasible, outcomes-driven institutional metric of colonoscopy quality.